Posted on Leave a comment

#Midwest 📅 date and times for #HomeRun4Julian ⚾️ 📰 #PressFreedom #Chicago #Columbus, OH.

Assange’s family members will meet with activists, press, and policymakers to raise awareness of the importance of protecting whistleblowers and journalists, and to advocate for the release of Julian Assange, whom the United Nations has declared “arbitrarily detained” since 2010.

Chicago June 17th 4:30pm | 625 N Michigan Ave Featuring: Jerome McDonnell Facebook

Columbus, OH
June 14th
1pm | Statehouse

Posted on Leave a comment

It’s happening as we speak. Just please remember the #Good I did in trying to spark this #GlobalRevolution. 🌐🔥 #AnonymousWorldwide 🌋🏦

https://www.instagram.com/p/CP9Z_L7Mnvx/?utm_medium=copy_link

Posted on Leave a comment

@MissingKids What do you think about this? “#UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful to Children.” I personally find it disturbing. 🤮

https://c-fam.org/friday_fax/unicef-report-says-pornography-not-always-harmful-to-children/


WASHINGTON, D.C., May 14 (C-Fam) A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.

The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.

Porn fighters disagree with the UNICEF data. “UNICEF’s report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children. By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children’s health and safety,” said Lisa Thompson, vice president and director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.

Thompson’s organization, which provides expert research to inform policy decisions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of women and children, has found that pornography can be a central driver of this abuse.

“Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism – all of which children should not consume,” continued Thompson, and “UNICEF’s milquetoast assessment of the impacts hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign, and as a result, puts children in harm’s way.”

The 2020 EU Kids Online Study concluded that some children and young people “intentionally seek out sexual content” for a variety of reasons and that seeing sexual images “might also represent an opportunity” to provide answers to questions about puberty and sexual identity. The study encouraged “seeing the nuances” which lead children to seek out and view sexual content online.

UNICEF says any efforts to block children from accessing pornography online might infringe on their human rights. UNICEF bases this claim on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

UNICEF also claims that asking for age-verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls “vital sexuality education.” It should be noted that critics charge “comprehensive sexuality education” is pornographic and harmful to children.

UNICEF’s release of this report comes just days after the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its longstanding partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding. The U.S. is UNICEF’s largest government donor with 2020 funding reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.

UNICEF generally has joined the feminist push at the United Nations in calls for abortion. The children’s agency was founded to help displaced children after the Second World War. Critics say UNICEF has strayed far from its founding vision, and that this call for children’s access to pornography under the guise of human rights and sex-ed underscores this change. At one time, the Holy See stopped its annual symbolic donation to UNICEF.

Securitas North America Announces Partnership with NCMEC

https://www.securitasinc.com/news/securitas-north-america-announces-partnership-with-the-national-center-for-missing–exploited-children-on-national-missing-childrens-day/

Hopefully neither of them are working with UNICEF. 😳

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bsuf0oCn3aD/?utm_medium=copy_link

Posted on Leave a comment

@CIA #FreeJulianAssange, the whole world knows he’s innocent. Jokes on you now. 🃏 #WeAreAllAssange 🗺

Posted on Leave a comment

#WeAreAllAssange 🍀 📰 ⏰ #Censorship #Bias #SocialMedia #PressFreedoms

https://www.instagram.com/p/CNstgCUDmhw/?igshid=1llkwdrpn55mm

Posted on Leave a comment

Like every #Friday we speak out for Julian #Assange and press freedom on hashtag: #WeAreAllAssange Do you value an independent press, do you want to make sure those in power are being held accountable? Do you want to stop an innocent journalist from being extradited? Join us.

Posted on Leave a comment

Our brother @YourMarkLubbers account has been suspended! @Twitter @TwitterSupport @jack kindly reinstate our brothers account. 🙏 🌐 Thank you! #Anonymous #Anon #AnonOps #AnonFamily #Twitter

This censorship is not justified. Twitter became a platform of no right. You see the staggering number of peodcriminal and porn accounts on twitter.. Accounts that date for years and with many followers and are not suspended.

Posted on Leave a comment

#Anonymous #anon #anonops #anonfamily this was planned. 🚰☠💰

to control all life on the planet all you need is control over WATER FOOD POWER – Vandman


Bush Family Evil Empire join the rush to privatize the world’s water supplies
democraticunderground.com/10022473474
The New “Water Barons”: Wall Street Mega-Banks are Buying up the World’s Water shar.es/14zvDl
Bush Family Buy Up Guarani Aquifer shar.es/14zvQV
Why Did George Bush Buy Nearly 300,000 acres in Paraguay? https://5minforecast.com/2015/04/24/why-did-george-bush-buy-nearly-300000-acres-in-paraguay/
50K View … REAL NEWS …: July 2014 What the Bush Family Knew,, Before th… 50kview.blogspot.com/2014/07/july-2

Posted on Leave a comment

#YemeniCrisis 💀 A different perspective #Follow: @YemeniFatima @MiddleEastInst

This doesn’t mean not to donate, (I just want you to know what’s really going on,) babies are still starving in the worst humanitarian crisis of our time.

Yemen can’t wait! Please Donate generously. https://gofund.me/baa6ef44 👈

Posted on Leave a comment

Let’s destroy #ForcedPsychiatry. This is the #Salvation of the #Victims. #RT: @mh_reform @Demetry28 @PsychVictims #HumanRights

Psychiatry itself never acknowledges its criminal practice. Compulsory psychiatry must be abolished by law. And the victims themselves must do it. No one will do this without us.

Our Request:

Please Copy this Template and Email it to your Legislators!

https://medium.com/@BraveNewFilms.org/heres-how-to-contact-all-535-members-of-united-states-congress-call-email-tweet-20b8a1c54195


For more information visit: https://humanecoalition.com/blog/

An appeal to legislators
Dear MP. (name) In the last elections I voted for your party and I am addressing as your voter. Forced me to turn to you some vicious provisions of the law resulting in crimes and intolerable human tragedies. The perverse nature of these provisions lies in the fact that they legitimize the extremely cruel, inhuman activities of compulsory psychiatry. Psychiatric coercion is a clear example of the destruction of fundamental human rights. Leads to atrocities and crimes. Contradicts the declared objectives of the Criminal Code:

«The main tasks of the criminal code are the protection of rights and freedoms, human dignity.»

The psychiatric position declares the feelings, beliefs, and will of a person as a manifestation of the disease. Thus, canceling the intrinsic value of human individuality, allowing violence. By changing the essence of a person, adjusting him to a contrived template. How can such a position, such actions not exclude human rights, freedoms and dignity ?!

«The principle of equality of citizens before the law.»

Psychiatric coercion clearly destroys the principle of equality before the law. Since he with one side takes out of protection by law one group of citizens defined on the basis of mental health. (or rather, by the imposed psychiatric label) And gives them away into complete, uncontrolled domination to persons who have nothing to do with the right and responsibility. And on the other hand, it removes from responsibility before the law another group of citizens, defined as doctors, psychiatrists. How a state of affairs can the equality of all before the law not be violated in such?

«The guilt principle

A person is subject to criminal liability only for those socially dangerous actions (inaction) and socially dangerous consequences in relation to which his guilt has been established. Criminal liability for innocent harm is not allowed.»

The principle of psychiatric measures is to substitute a psychiatric diagnosis for court. It turns out that a person is condemned not for guilt, but for being sick. Coercive psychiatric measures obviously allow for the reprisal of a person, without established guilt.

«The principle of justice.

Punishment and other measures of a criminal-legal nature applied to a person, must be fair, that is, correspond to the nature and degree of social danger of the crime, the circumstances of its commission and the identity of the perpetrator. No one can be held criminally liable twice for the same crime.»

Coercive psychiatric measures are contrary to the principle of fairness of as they allow disregarding the circumstances of the incident, the personality of the accused. They allowing to act not in accordance with justice. Allow to carry out psychiatric reprisals many times, at the whim of psychiatrists, completely without taking into account the reasons.

Psychiatric “treatment” causes severe health damage. Destroys the body, human abilities. Destroys individuality, actually the person himself. Such actions cannot be classified otherwise than as crimes. And they directly fall under the articles of the Criminal Code on the infliction of grave damage. But contrary to the obvious, these atrocities are not suppressed by the court and vice versa – they are committed on legal grounds. Here the law contains absolutely incompatible contradictions. – Some provisions of the law explicitly prohibit such actions. At the same time, other provisions legalize them. And this means that any judge, executing articles of psychiatric legislation, when he gives a person to the power of psychiatrists, violates the fundamental principles of the law.

«Driving a person to suicide
Driving a person to suicide or attempted suicide by threats, cruel treatment or systematic humiliation of the victim’s human dignity»

Mocking, sadistic actions of persons carrying out psychiatric coercion cause serious damage, pushing a person beyond the possibility of living. A particularly sophisticated evil is that the effect of “treatment” often deprives a person of this last opportunity. A person lives, abides in hell as he cannot die. I emphasize that it is not the desire to die that is diminished, but the opportunity is absent. In that a special atrocity.

On the other hand, why destroy an unwanted person with “treatment”? If the whole problem is how to get rid of the bothering person, there may be other options. Not only “cure” For example, an unwanted person can simply be killed. Dead, he is guaranteed not to disturb anyone. How does this option not suit the haters of “psychos”? If a person is not allowed to live as his soul requires, then why not leave the opportunity to die? If he himself prefers death to “cure”, then why should he be deprived of even such extreme salvation ?!

Dear MP. – To turn to You me forced by extreme despair. Probably in the world there are no more disadvantaged, humiliated and disenfranchised than those who unfortunately happened to be endowed with a psychiatric label. Nobody’s rights have been denied to that extent! We cannot rely on the understanding of society, on the compassion and participation of officials. Us can only rely on the law itself. Therefore, I have to insist that you take into account the intolerable state of affairs. So that at sessions of parliament you would defend our rights and seek the exclusion of psychiatric coercion from measures acceptable in the human community at the legislative level. If You do not with this requirement and do not will seek the exclusion of psychiatric compulsion, I will refuse to trust you and longer for you for your party no will vote.