Almost 2k likes on one photo, but sure, turn down the one #Author at your #BookStore who doesn’t need a #PR manager. #DanielBrummitt #DisruptiveFineArt @dinogogoofficia #DinogoGoGlow @BNBuzz pic.twitter.com/1IMbSZIyPz
— DANIEL BRUMMITT (@D_A_N_I_E_L___B) June 9, 2021
Cited from https://www.pewresearch.org/
WASHINGTON, D.C., May 14 (C-Fam) A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.
The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.
Porn fighters disagree with the UNICEF data. “UNICEF’s report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children. By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children’s health and safety,” said Lisa Thompson, vice president and director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.
Thompson’s organization, which provides expert research to inform policy decisions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of women and children, has found that pornography can be a central driver of this abuse.
“Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism – all of which children should not consume,” continued Thompson, and “UNICEF’s milquetoast assessment of the impacts hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign, and as a result, puts children in harm’s way.”
The 2020 EU Kids Online Study concluded that some children and young people “intentionally seek out sexual content” for a variety of reasons and that seeing sexual images “might also represent an opportunity” to provide answers to questions about puberty and sexual identity. The study encouraged “seeing the nuances” which lead children to seek out and view sexual content online.
UNICEF says any efforts to block children from accessing pornography online might infringe on their human rights. UNICEF bases this claim on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
UNICEF also claims that asking for age-verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls “vital sexuality education.” It should be noted that critics charge “comprehensive sexuality education” is pornographic and harmful to children.
UNICEF’s release of this report comes just days after the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its longstanding partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding. The U.S. is UNICEF’s largest government donor with 2020 funding reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.
UNICEF generally has joined the feminist push at the United Nations in calls for abortion. The children’s agency was founded to help displaced children after the Second World War. Critics say UNICEF has strayed far from its founding vision, and that this call for children’s access to pornography under the guise of human rights and sex-ed underscores this change. At one time, the Holy See stopped its annual symbolic donation to UNICEF.
The agenda couldn’t get any clearerhttps://t.co/CqCbNCB616
— Imagine trusting Politicians and Celebrities😂 (@skye_daddy) May 30, 2021
Securitas North America Announces Partnership with NCMEC
Hopefully neither of them are working with UNICEF. 😳
Save 20% through May 27, 2021. CODE: ULTIMATE20 Click for details.
This censorship is not justified. Twitter became a platform of no right. You see the staggering number of peodcriminal and porn accounts on twitter.. Accounts that date for years and with many followers and are not suspended.
— ANONYMOUS | ANONOPS | ANONYMOUS OPERATION |📡 (@Y0urAnonOPS) April 26, 2021
— VANDMAN (@vandman777) February 13, 2016
Why Did George Bush Buy Nearly 300,000 acres in Paraguay? https://5minforecast.com/2015/04/24/why-did-george-bush-buy-nearly-300000-acres-in-paraguay/
Read 👈 📖
It’s awesome that Anonymous Worldwide has published my work again. Check it out at:https://t.co/Bto5sG9jVA
“Silencing Dissidents Has Undermined Popular Narratives about Democracy Since Ancient Times”#FreeAssangeNOW #DropTheCharges #JournalismIsNotACrime pic.twitter.com/Bcgf34gOo5
— Eric Harvey (@ReframerOrg) April 12, 2021
1/ In progress: M. Elmaazi describing testimony at the extradition trial of Julian Assange. “Regardless of where you are on the planet, U.S. espionage laws…can be used out the jurisdiction of the U.S. to prosecute journalists wherever they are.”
— Ann Batiza (@AnnBatiza) April 19, 2021
No central nodes or servers
No data collection
No monthly or yearly fees
No paid employees
We code a tool to reclaim your freedom online and we donate it to you.
— Summon.social (@SummonSocial) April 8, 2021